|
July 25, 1997 NRC JACKSON BLASTS
INTERIOR'S "FACT SHEET" ON WARD VALLEY AS ERRONEOUS In a July 22 letter to Interior Secretary Bruce Babbitt, Nuclear Regulatory Commissioner (NRC) Shirley Ann Jackson accused Interior of providing erroneous, misleading information directly attributable to the Ward Valley opponent group, Committee to Bridge the Gap. The NRC is focussed on protection of public health and safety and oversees the radiological helath and safety program of the California Department of Health Services (DHS). The NRC has said that DHS has a highly effective program for managing low-leve l waste and the license for the Ward Valley facility was issued in conformance with NRC regulations and policy. Referring to a "Fact Sheet" distributed at a press conference held by Interior Deputy Secretary John Garamendi, Jackson stated that "This Fact Sheet contains several errors and statements that may mislead the reader...NRC is concerned that some of the subjective information of the document is characterized as factual." Particularly upsetting
to Jackson is the assertion that the table identifying the sources and
amounts of radioactive waste that is projected to go to the Ward Valley
facility is erroneously attributed to NRC, the U.S. Department of Energy
(DOE), U.S. Ecology, the Southwestern Compact, and the Ward Valley EIS.
"Raw data from the sources quoted appear to have been interpreted based
on uncertain assumptions about future activities of generators to produce
the figures in the table." Those figures, Jackson noted, "are identical
to those in a March 1994 Committee to Bridge the Gap report." Finally, Jackson stressed that no NRC news is not necessarily good news for DOI. In the absence of any formal arrangement with DOI for NRC comment or review on the accuracy or even awareness of DOI documents, implied NRC approval is inappropriate. "The absence of NRC comments does not imply an NRC judgement with respect to the technical accuracy or completeness of such documents," Jackson wrote. Interior, which lacks expertise in this issue, has been critized for not seeking advice from the NRC. Formal NRC points of contention on Interior "Fact Sheets" include:
|
You may read the Chairman's letter here.
©1997 Calrad Forum